Threat Actors Breach High Value Targets like Google in Salesforce Attacks – What Organizations Need to Know

The escalation of sophisticated cyberattacks targeting Salesforce environments has emerged as one of the most concerning trends in enterprise cybersecurity.

As organizations increasingly rely on customer relationship management (CRM) platforms to store their most sensitive business data, threat actors have recognized the immense value these systems represent.

Recent intelligence indicates that attackers are successfully compromising high-profile organizations by exploiting vulnerabilities in Salesforce configurations, third-party integrations, and human factors.

The attacks demonstrate a concerning evolution in tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) specifically designed to bypass traditional security controls and extract valuable customer data, intellectual property, and financial information.

Understanding these emerging attack vectors and implementing comprehensive defensive measures has become critical for organizations seeking to protect their digital assets and maintain customer trust in an increasingly hostile cyber landscape.

Rise of Salesforce-Based Attacks

Stay plugged into threat intel feeds from CISA, FBI, and ISACs. Known indicators of compromise, such as attacker VoIP numbers, phishing domains, or extortion email addresses, can help you spot active campaigns in your environment.

Cloud-based CRM platforms now house customer databases containing millions of records, financial transactions, sales intelligence, and proprietary business processes, making them attractive targets for both financially motivated cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors.

The attack surface has expanded dramatically as organizations integrate Salesforce with numerous third-party applications, creating complex webs of interconnected systems that introduce multiple potential entry points for malicious actors.

Threat intelligence reveals that organized cybercriminal groups have developed specialized capabilities specifically targeting Salesforce environments, including custom tools for credential harvesting, API exploitation, and data exfiltration.

These groups often conduct extensive reconnaissance to identify high-value targets, focusing on organizations in financial services, healthcare, technology, and government sectors where Salesforce implementations contain particularly sensitive information.

The attacks typically begin with sophisticated social engineering campaigns designed to compromise administrative credentials, followed by careful lateral movement within the Salesforce environment to avoid detection while maximizing data collection.

The economic incentives driving these attacks have intensified significantly, with stolen customer databases commanding premium prices on dark web marketplaces.

GTIG confirmed the breach was part of the UNC6040/ShinyHunters activity, with custom tools used to accelerate Salesforce data extraction.

A complete customer database with financial information can sell for $50-200 per record, while intellectual property and business intelligence can generate even higher returns.

This lucrative market has attracted increasingly sophisticated threat actors who invest substantial resources in developing attack capabilities and maintaining persistent access to compromised systems.

High-profile Breach: A Case Study in High-Value Target Exploitation

Contemporary attack patterns demonstrate the sophisticated methodologies threat actors employ when targeting enterprise Salesforce implementations.

In analyzing documented attack scenarios, security researchers have identified common characteristics that define successful breaches of high-value targets.

These attacks typically begin with extensive reconnaissance phases where threat actors gather intelligence about target organizations through open source intelligence (OSINT), social media analysis, and technical reconnaissance of exposed systems.

The attack progression follows a predictable pattern: initial compromise through credential theft or social engineering, followed by privilege escalation within the Salesforce environment, establishment of persistence mechanisms, and systematic data exfiltration. 

Advanced persistent threat (APT) groups have demonstrated particular sophistication in maintaining long-term access to compromised Salesforce environments, sometimes remaining undetected for months while continuously exfiltrating sensitive data.

One documented attack vector involves threat actors compromising third-party applications connected to Salesforce through OAuth token abuse.

By obtaining legitimate OAuth tokens through phishing campaigns targeting application administrators, attackers can maintain persistent access that appears legitimate to security monitoring systems.

This technique allows continuous data access without repeatedly triggering authentication alerts, making detection significantly more challenging for security teams.

The business impact of these breaches extends far beyond immediate data loss, encompassing regulatory fines, customer notification costs, competitive disadvantage from stolen intellectual property, and long-term brand reputation damage.

Organizations have reported total breach costs ranging from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the scope of data compromised and regulatory requirements in their operating jurisdictions.

Confirmed victims include Google, Allianz Life (impacting the majority of its 1.4 million customers), LVMH brands Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Tiffany & Co., Adidas, Qantas, and Chanel’s U.S. client-care database. In each case, attackers used variations of the same method to gain long-lived access and extract CRM records.

Attack Vectors in Salesforce Environments

The attack surface in Salesforce environments encompasses multiple vectors that threat actors systematically exploit to gain unauthorized access and extract valuable data. 

Phishing attacks remain the most common initial compromise method, with attackers crafting highly targeted campaigns that appear to originate from legitimate Salesforce communications.

These attacks often incorporate organization-specific branding and terminology gathered during reconnaissance phases, significantly increasing their effectiveness against even security-aware targets.

Attack Vector	Attack Method	Entry Point	Technical Complexity	Detection Difficulty	Potential Impact	Common Indicators
Phishing Attacks	Targeted emails mimicking Salesforce communications	Email/User Interface	Low	Medium	High	Unusual login locations/times
API Exploitation	Unauthorized API calls using compromised tokens	REST/SOAP API	Medium	Medium	Very High	High API call volume
OAuth Token Abuse	Stolen OAuth tokens for persistent access	OAuth Endpoints	Medium	High	Very High	Long-lived token usage
SOQL Injection	Malicious SOQL queries through vulnerable inputs	Custom Applications	High	Medium	High	Abnormal database queries
Third-party App Vulnerabilities	Exploiting vulnerabilities in AppExchange apps	AppExchange Apps	Medium	High	Very High	Unexpected app permissions
Social Engineering	Impersonation of IT staff or executives	Phone/Email/Chat	Low	High	High	Unusual admin requests
Credential Stuffing	Automated login attempts using leaked credentials	Login Interface	Low	Low	Medium	Multiple failed logins
Session Hijacking	Intercepting or hijacking active user sessions	Session Tokens	High	High	High	Session anomalies
Privilege Escalation	Exploiting misconfigurations in permissions	Permission Sets	High	Medium	Very High	Permission changes
Custom Code Exploitation	Code injection in Apex/Visualforce components	Custom Code	High	High	Very High	Code execution errors
Workflow Automation Abuse	Creating malicious workflows and processes	Process Builder	Medium	High	High	Unauthorized workflows
Data Export Manipulation	Abusing legitimate export features for data theft	Reports & Dashboards	Low	Medium	Very High	Large data exports

Key Techniques Used in Salesforce Attack

Modern Salesforce attacks employ increasingly sophisticated techniques that leverage both technical vulnerabilities and human factors to achieve their objectives. 

SOQL injection attacks represent a significant technical threat, where attackers exploit insufficient input validation in custom applications or integrations to execute unauthorized database queries.

These attacks can bypass standard access controls and extract sensitive data that would normally be protected by Salesforce’s sharing model.

Privilege escalation techniques focus on exploiting misconfigurations in permission sets, profiles, and sharing rules to gain access to data beyond the attacker’s intended scope.

Threat actors systematically examine org configurations to identify opportunities for lateral movement and privilege expansion, often targeting administrative functionalities that provide system-wide access.

Custom code exploitation targets vulnerabilities in Apex code, Visualforce pages, and Lightning components developed by organizations or third-party vendors.

These attacks require significant technical sophistication but can provide comprehensive system access when successful. Attackers often focus on identifying code injection vulnerabilities, insecure API calls, and improper data handling practices.

Workflow and process automation abuse involves manipulating Salesforce’s automation features to execute unauthorized actions or extract data through legitimate system processes.

Attackers may create hidden workflows, scheduled jobs, or process builder flows that operate continuously in the background, making detection extremely difficult through standard monitoring approaches.

Data exfiltration techniques have evolved to avoid triggering standard security alerts while maximizing the volume of stolen information.

Attackers employ techniques such as gradual data extraction through legitimate APIs, abuse of standard reporting features, and integration with external systems to move data out of the Salesforce environment without detection.

Potential Business and Security Implications

Impact Category	Average Cost Range (USD)	Recovery Timeline	Likelihood in Salesforce Breach
Data Breach Fines (GDPR/CCPA)	$500K – $20M	6-24 months	High
Business Disruption Costs	$100K – $2M	1-6 months	Very High
Incident Response & Forensics	$50K – $500K	2-8 weeks	Very High
Customer Notification Costs	$10K – $100K	2-4 weeks	High
Legal & Regulatory Costs	$100K – $1M	3-12 months	Medium
Brand Reputation Damage	$1M – $10M	12-36 months	High
Customer Churn & Revenue Loss	$500K – $5M	6-24 months	High
System Remediation & Updates	$50K – $300K	4-12 weeks	Very High
Enhanced Security Implementation	$200K – $1M	3-9 months	Very High
Compliance Audit Costs	$25K – $150K	6-12 weeks	Medium

The business implications of successful Salesforce attacks extend far beyond immediate technical concerns, creating cascading effects that can impact organizational operations for years following a breach. 

Regulatory compliance violations represent immediate financial and legal risks, particularly for organizations subject to GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, or industry-specific regulations.

Data breach notifications, regulatory investigations, and potential fines can consume significant organizational resources and create ongoing compliance obligations.

Customer trust erosion following a Salesforce breach often results in measurable business impact through increased customer churn, reduced sales conversion rates, and damaged brand reputation.

Organizations frequently report difficulty acquiring new customers following public disclosure of security incidents, as prospects question the organization’s ability to protect sensitive information.

Competitive disadvantage emerges when attackers steal intellectual property, pricing strategies, customer insights, or strategic plans stored within Salesforce systems.

This information may be sold to competitors or used to undermine the organization’s market position, creating long-term business implications that extend far beyond the immediate cost of incident response.

Operational disruption during incident response and recovery phases can significantly impact business continuity, particularly for organizations heavily dependent on Salesforce for sales, marketing, and customer service operations.

System lockdowns, data restoration procedures, and enhanced security implementations often require temporary operational restrictions that affect productivity and revenue generation.

Legal liability from affected customers, partners, or stakeholders creates additional financial exposure through class-action lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and contractual penalties.

Organizations may face years of litigation and associated legal costs, even when implementing comprehensive security measures following the incident.

The total cost of ownership for security incidents continues to escalate, with recent studies indicating average costs exceeding $4 million for significant data breaches involving cloud platforms.

These costs encompass immediate incident response expenses, regulatory fines, legal fees, customer notification costs, credit monitoring services, system upgrades, and ongoing security enhancements required to prevent future incidents.

Tim West, Head of Threat Intelligence at WithSecure, notes: “Scattered Spider deploy social engineering to gain access to SaaS environments. Their attacks may look technically simple, but that doesn’t make them any less dangerous. They’ve been linked to the MGM and M&S breaches.”

Major UK retailers including M&S, Co-op, were forced offline by a wave of ransomware and data theft attacks attributed to Scattered Spider (UNC3944).

In a separate incident, the Gehenna group breached Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) Salesforce dashboards and exfiltrated over 23 million records. This included:

• 7.5 million account records.
• 9.5 million customer service cases.
• 6 million contact entries.
• 400,000 product records.

Best Practices for Strengthening Salesforce Security

Implementing comprehensive Salesforce security requires a multi-layered approach that addresses both technical vulnerabilities and human factors while maintaining operational efficiency. 

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) implementation across all user accounts represents the most critical foundational security control, significantly reducing the likelihood of successful credential-based attacks.

Organizations should mandate MFA for all users, implement conditional access policies based on risk factors, and regularly review authentication logs for suspicious activity.

Identity and access management (IAM) optimization involves implementing the principle of least privilege through carefully configured permission sets, profiles, and sharing rules.

Organizations should conduct regular access reviews, implement role-based access controls aligned with business functions, and establish automated processes for provisioning and deprovisioning user access based on organizational changes.

API security hardening requires implementing comprehensive controls around API access, including rate limiting, IP restrictions, token lifecycle management, and detailed logging of all API activities.

Organizations should regularly audit API integrations, implement OAuth best practices, and monitor for unusual API usage patterns that may indicate compromise.

Security monitoring and logging capabilities should encompass all Salesforce activities, including login events, data access patterns, configuration changes, and API usage.

Organizations need to implement real-time alerting for suspicious activities, maintain comprehensive audit trails, and integrate Salesforce logging with broader security information and event management (SIEM) systems.

Third-party application management involves implementing rigorous security assessment processes for all applications installed from the AppExchange or developed by external vendors.

Organizations should maintain inventories of all connected applications, regularly review application permissions, and implement processes for ongoing security monitoring of third-party integrations.

Data classification and protection strategies should categorize all data stored within Salesforce based on sensitivity levels and implement appropriate controls for each classification.

This includes field-level encryption for highly sensitive data, data loss prevention policies, and regular data retention reviews to minimize the volume of sensitive information at risk.

Incident response planning specifically for Salesforce environments should include procedures for isolating compromised accounts, preserving forensic evidence, coordinating with Salesforce support, managing customer communications, and implementing recovery procedures.

Organizations should regularly test incident response procedures through tabletop exercises and maintain updated contact information for all relevant stakeholders.

Security awareness training programs should include Salesforce-specific scenarios, emphasizing the unique risks associated with cloud CRM platforms and the high value of data stored within these systems.

Training should cover phishing recognition, social engineering tactics, proper password management, and procedures for reporting suspicious activities.

Regular security assessments and penetration testing should evaluate Salesforce configurations, custom code security, integration security, and overall security posture.

These assessments should include both automated vulnerability scanning and manual testing by qualified security professionals familiar with Salesforce-specific attack vectors.

The evolving threat landscape targeting Salesforce environments demands continuous vigilance and proactive security measures from organizations of all sizes.

As threat actors continue to develop more sophisticated attack capabilities, organizations must implement comprehensive security programs that address technical vulnerabilities, human factors, and business processes.

The combination of proper security controls, ongoing monitoring, and regular security assessments provides the foundation for protecting valuable data and maintaining customer trust in an increasingly challenging cybersecurity environment.

Find this Story Interesting! Follow us on LinkedIn and X to Get More Instant Updates.