New Twitter Launches as Startup Claims Elon Musk’s X Abandoned the Twitter Name

A startup operating as Operation Bluebird, Inc. has launched early access to a new social media service on Twitter.now, positioning itself as a revival of the Twitter brand that Elon Musk’s X Corp. abandoned after its 2023 rebrand.

The company says it is independent of X Corp. and is rebuilding the former “town square” model around user-controlled trust signals, paid access, and an anti-bot focus.

Bluebird’s pitch is direct and challenging: it presents the project as a struggle to take back a well-known internet identity from X, which used to be called Twitter.

The startup says it acquired or is using the name that X Corp. “walked away from,” although its public materials do not establish the scope of its trademark rights, the jurisdictions involved, or whether litigation over the name is expected.

Those questions will be central as the service attempts to use one of social media’s most recognizable brands. Notably, X started to phase out the Twitter Domain – Users Advised to Re-enroll in 2FA Keys

The platform is currently offering “Founder” early-access memberships for $20, while users who contribute $40 or more receive “Fighter” status. Bluebird says the payment model is intended to keep the service independent of advertisers, limit bot-driven signups, reserve account handles, and fund both platform development and its campaign to defend the name. The company describes these payments as a contribution toward the platform rather than a conventional product purchase.

At the center of the proposed product is VERA, a forthcoming trust system paired with what Bluebird calls “Trust OS.” Rather than broadly removing posts or banning users, the company says it plans to assign visible trust signals to content and let individuals set a threshold for what reaches their feed.

In practice, users could choose to hide lower-trust material while still allowing it to remain on the service. Bluebird summarizes the approach as “freedom of speech, not freedom of reach.”

That design raises familiar cybersecurity and platform-integrity challenges. Any system that scores content credibility will need strong safeguards against coordinated manipulation, brigading, fake-account farms, political bias claims, and abuse of trust indicators.

The startup has not yet disclosed the technical signals that will drive its scoring model, how users can appeal incorrect labels, how it will authenticate accounts, or how it will prevent attackers from gaming reputation mechanisms at scale.

Bluebird says its safety rules will prohibit illegal content, child exploitation, threats, harassment, scams, and other harmful behavior. It also claims that explicit content will be excluded from the public feed and that its policies will develop as the service expands.

However, the company’s stated preference for reducing reach rather than removing content means its moderation architecture will face pressure to distinguish legitimate dissent from coordinated disinformation and fraud.

For security professionals, the launch is another example of how platform trust has become both a technical and commercial feature. Identity assurance, bot resistance, content provenance, user reporting, and transparent enforcement will likely determine whether Bluebird can turn its branding campaign into a resilient social network.

Prevent incidents due to slow investigations. Power your Tier 1 with threat intelligence from 15K SOCs: Integrate TI Lookup in your SOC