Multiple online sources state that, as of the end of 2026, 78% of companies worldwide report using AI. And we’re not surprised.
AI can do absolutely everything, but we’re still in the stage where not everyone knows how to use it correctly, especially when it comes to internal staff use and sharing company data.
But if security teams vet an AI assistant before using it, they reduce risks to consumer data safety. Read on to learn more.
There are several reasons security teams should vet an AI assistant before allowing staff to paste in customer data. The main reasons are as follows:
Do all of that so you can choose an AI provider for your staff to use. Each has different features and ways of using your data, so the best option depends on what you find during your investigation.
Realistically, it depends on the information and the tool. Customer data shouldn’t be automatically prohibited on every AI platform, but your security teams should decide what to process and which tools to use, with appropriate safeguards.
And there should always be contractual agreements. Consumers have to know what you’re doing with their data.
Ideally, if you are pasting customer data into AI, staff should replace customer names with anonymous identifiers and remove contact information or account numbers before using AI.
And some information will require safeguards. For example, healthcare organizations subject to HIPAA generally need a business associate agreement (BAA) when an outside cloud provider processes protected health information on their behalf.
Once an AI platform is selected, the rest is about security teams managing how staff use consumer data and AI. One of the best ways is to establish clear AI usage policies and provide training. Ideally, the training should be regular.
Policies should clearly state which consumer data employees can share and which platforms are approved. You can include clear examples of customer records (anonymized), financial details, or internal business documents to show staff what can and can’t be used.
Training should also focus on responsible AI use, with it made clear to staff how AI providers access information and how to recognize sensitive data.
Policy revisions and ongoing training are essential.
Vetting an AI assistant is smart when customer data is involved. Data, in general, is more sensitive than ever, and this active approach can help reduce the risk of everything from identity fraud to cyberattacks.
But more than that, it’s about ensuring that security teams properly train staff so that they know what to do with data.
OpenAI has launched GPT-6 Cyber, a security-focused AI model that found 81 new high-severity Firefox…
Shopify is making IP allowlisting mandatory for public apps that call its Admin API, adding…
Microsoft’s Windows Paint vulnerability, CVE-2026-83844, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute code over a…
Melbourne, Florida, November 5th, 2026, CyberNewswire OpenMatter Network, a pioneer in decentralized infrastructure for agentic…
A new Android bug named GhostMap can leave a phone stuck in a crash loop…
A China-aligned hacking group is abusing Sogou Input Method, one of the most popular Chinese…